Martin's profileMartin's FactoryPhotosBlogLists Tools Help

Blog


    December 15

    Suunto finds your path to glory on Google Earth

    POSTED Thursday, December 14, 2006

    Suunto finds your path to glory on Google Earth

    Related Entries:  GPS : Internet

    Suunto_Google.jpg

    "Look where I've been!" will become your catch phrase once you download a new program called Track Exporter from sports-watch maker Suunto. Made to work with the company's X9 or X9i (above), the free download will take the GPS data from the watch and then plot out your wanderings on Google Earth. You can even do fancy stuff like panning 3D flyovers of the path you took. Avid hikers, runners, mountain bikers, and people with bad memories will love it.

    But as Charlie White over at Gizmodo points out, you can do the same thing with Garmin's Forerunner GPS gear with a free download called Foreconv. Just export your history file from the Garmin software and Foreconv will run it over to Google Earth for a frighteningly detailed account of the routes you've traveled.

    If you're totally blown away by all this pathfinding but don't own either, you can either find yourself a Garmin Forerunner 301 on Amazon for about $150, whereas Suunto's X9i will set you back at least $375. It is pretty damn hot, though. Thanks to Jenny for the sweet tip! — Peter Pachal

    December 14

    Entropy

    Entropy

    A function first introduced in classical thermodynamics to provide a quantitative basis for the common observation that naturally occurring processes have a particular direction. Subsequently, in statistical thermodynamics, entropy was shown to be a measure of the number of microstates a system could assume. Finally, in communication theory, entropy is a measure of information. Each of these aspects will be considered in turn. Before the entropy function is introduced, it is necessary to discuss reversible processes.

    Reversible processes

    Any system under constant external conditions is observed to change in such a way as to approach a particularly simple final state called an equilibrium state. For example, two bodies initially at different temperatures are connected by a metal wire. Heat flows from the hot to the cold body until the temperatures of both bodies are the same. It is common experience that the reverse processes never occur if the systems are left to themselves; that is, heat is never observed to flow from the cold to the hot body. Max Planck classified all elementary processes into three categories: natural, unnatural, and reversible. Natural processes do occur, and proceed in a direction toward equilibrium. Unnatural processes move away from equilibrium and never occur. A reversible process is an idealized natural process that passes through a continuous sequence of equilibrium states.

    Entropy function

    The state function entropy S puts the foregoing discussion on a quantitative basis. Entropy is related to q, the heat flowing into the system from its surroundings, and to T, the absolute temperature of the system. The important properties for this discussion are:

    1. dS > q/T for a natural change.

     dS = q/T for a reversible change.

    2. The entropy of the system S is made up of the sum of all the parts of the system so that S = S1 + S2 + S3 ···.

    Nonconservation

    In his study of the first law of thermodynamics, J. P. Joule caused work to be expended by rubbing metal blocks together in a large mass of water. By this and similar experiments, he established numerical relationships between heat and work. When the experiment was completed, the apparatus remained unchanged except for a slight increase in the water temperature. Work (W) had been converted into heat (Q) with 100% efficiency. Provided the process was carried out slowly, the temperature difference between the blocks and the water would be small, and heat transfer could be considered a reversible process. The entropy increase of the water at its temperature T is ?S = Q/T = W/T. Since everything but the water is unchanged, this equation also represents the total entropy increase. The entropy has been created from the work input, and this process could be continued indefinitely, creating more and more entropy. Unlike energy, entropy is not conserved.

    Degradation of energy

    Energy is never destroyed. But in the Joule friction experiment and in heat transfer between bodies, as in any natural process, something is lost. In the Joule experiment, the energy expended in work now resides in the water bath. But if this energy is reused, less useful work is obtained than was originally put in. The original energy input has been degraded to a less useful form. The energy transferred from a high-temperature body to a lower-temperature body is also in a less useful form. If another system is used to restore this degraded energy to its original form, it is found that the restoring system has degraded the energy even more than the original system had. Thus, every process occurring in the world results in an overall increase in entropy and a corresponding degradation in energy.

    Measure of information

    The probability characteristic of entropy leads to its use in communication theory as a measure of information. The absence of information about a situation is equivalent to an uncertainty associated with the nature of the situation. This uncertainty is the entropy of the information about the particular situation.

    “熵”是德国物理学家克劳修斯在1850年创造的一个术语,他用它来表示任何一种能量在空间中分布的均匀程度。能量分布得越均匀,熵就越大。如果对于我们所考虑的那个系统来说,能量完全均匀地分布,那么,这个系统的熵就达到最大值。

     

    [转贴] 记忆中几位哲学家/数学家的轶事

    [转贴] 记忆中几位哲学家/数学家的轶事

    到处乱逛,看到这位老兄的帖子,不错-虽然错误不少!跟贴也很有趣。俺就只转贴原文了。
    出处:Link
    作者:孤舟http://blog.chinaunix.net/index.php?blogId=548

    ==正文
    昨天在linuxforum论坛上看到有朋友讲到数学家Hilbert悼念自己学生的轶事,觉得挺有意思。晚上睡不着觉,就凭自己的记忆,回忆一些曾经知道的数学家/哲学家/计算机科学家的有趣轶事。因为自己离开这些领域太久了,加上毫无资料可以复案,有些材料我完全不敢确保真实性,希望不要扔鸡蛋砸偶:-)

      1, 阿基米德
      阿基米德应该是希腊人吧?小时候看画报,说罗马士兵攻破希腊的时候,闯入阿基米德的住宅,当时阿基米德正在计算一道数学题,士兵已经把兵器架在了他的脖子上,他抬头说到:“抱歉,请等我把这道题算完。”──结果呢?那个士兵当然不等他。

      2, 数学家高斯
      高斯的夫人临终的时候,对仆人说,她特别想见一见高斯先生。仆人就去请高斯,但是高斯当时正在计算一道数学题,根本没有理仆人。夫人抱恨而终。
      费马大定理(用C程序来表示,就是pow(x,n)+pow(y,n)=pow(z,n)这个数学等式,当n>2时,找不到三元整数组(x,y,z)满足该等式)是300多年前的费马提出的假想。高斯在一本书的边白上写道,自己已经找到了费马大定理的证明,可是这块空白太小了,写不下。于是费马大定理又经过了数百年,直到二十世纪末才得到证明。这也算是一个趣事,不过有人怀疑高斯并没有办法证明费马大定理,只不过想通过这种方法来诱惑后人来试图证明它。

      3, 哲学家康德
      听过“哲学”一词的人都知道伊曼努尔·康德这个人。康德一生足迹未曾出过哥尼斯堡小镇,他只信仰自己头顶的那片星空。
      正如同他的哲学学说那样,康德的生活极其简单而单调。传说他每天散步经过当地居民门前的时候,人们就以这个时间来校准自己的时钟(多说一句,我们中国也有这种人,《汉书·霍光传》记载大将军霍光每次出入宫殿,踏过的地方都是固定的)。康德一生著述丰富,涉及哲学、社会学、伦理学、天文学等各个方面。他终生单身,临终忏悔的时候,神父问他可有什么罪过需要忏悔?康德想了半天说:我年轻时候曾经对表妹动过歪念头。
      (P.S.我不大喜欢康德的哲学,主要是因为他依旧没有摆脱形而上学的蕃篱。)

      4, 哲学家路德维希·维特根斯坦
      Ludwig Wittgensitein是二十世纪最杰出的哲学家,也是最奇怪的一个人。通常认为“他以天才的犀利批评,彻底抽空了整个西方形而上学的基础”。 维特根斯坦的父亲是欧洲的钢铁大王,维特根斯坦就凭着遗产成为了当时全欧洲最富有的年轻人。另外,维特根斯坦和希特勒还是中学同学呢,只不过希特勒比他低一级,而且后来又留了一级。但是,维氏把自己所有的财产都捐献给了慈善机构,来救济一些穷困潦倒的艺术家和文学家(只记得其中就有杰出的诗人里尔克,就是写《杜伊诺哀歌》和《致奥尔弗斯的十四行诗》的),自己一生清贫。
      维特根斯坦后来进入剑桥大学的三一学院读书,师从罗素和摩尔研究数理逻辑。后来实在穷得无法生活了,就申请奖学金,但是学院的管理人员无论如何都不肯相信:就凭你钢铁大王的儿子还需要这点奖学金?
      维特根斯坦不懂哲学史,这似乎是个缺点,但是因此导致了他的哲学是二十世纪所有哲学家中独创性最高的。他发表那本薄薄的《逻辑哲学论》时还不到30岁,发表之后,他自信的认为自己已经解决了“所有的哲学问题”,于是,跑到一个偏僻的小乡村里隐居做小学教师去了。由于此前他一点名气都没有,幸亏罗素为他的《逻辑哲学论》写了序言,才得以出版;但是,这本薄薄的小册子却改写了整个二十世纪英美分析哲学,并直接导致了维也纳学派的诞生。
      维特根斯坦是个全才。他11岁的时候自己发明了一台缝纫机;在剑桥取得建筑学(建筑学还是空气力学,不记得了)硕士学位,为自己的姐姐设计了据说是当时全欧洲最好的别墅;他还是一流的小提琴演奏者。他在听罗素讲了一学期的数理逻辑后,第二学期开学时,罗素发现维特根斯坦坐在讲堂里,于是对他说:“维特根斯坦先生,你不需要来听我讲课了,我已经没有任何东西可以教给你了。”
      绝大多数哲学家的思考生涯中,都会发生某种程度的思想转向,但前后的思想总会有某种蛛丝马迹的联系。维特根斯坦是个极端的例子:后期的他,完全推翻了自己前期的学说,前后学说水火不容。于是英美分析哲学再度为之转向。英国哲学史家艾耶尔说:“对一个哲学家来说,从世俗的角度看来,他所作的最幸运的事情,莫过于能够改变整个哲学的方向了──但是这件事维特根斯坦做了两次。”
      多说一句,维特根斯坦是同性恋。

      5, 数学家与哲学家:怀特海&罗素
      怀特海与罗素是师生关系,二人的巨著《数学原理》奠定了原子主义数学体系的基础。二人都是典型的英国绅士。晚年的时候,怀特海在报上发表了一篇文章,被罗素看到了,不同意其观点,于是撰文说“怀特海老糊涂了”;怀特海回报了罗素一下,撰文说“罗素还不成熟”。这一年怀特海90岁,罗素80岁。
      罗素悖论。当时的法国数学家彭加勒(被称作最后一位数学全才的是不是他?还是希尔伯特?不记得了)在巴黎数学大会上说:“现在人们可以说:绝对的严格数学已经达到了。”瞧,多乐观!可是罗素先生就在这个时候发表了他的悖论。最初是说:“包含所有集合的那个集合,是否是自身的真子集?”无论你回答是或否,都不对。一开始人们认为只是集合论的一些概念没处理好,没什么大问题。后来罗素简化了悖论的陈述,成为:“村子里的理发师,只为村子里那些不为自己理发的人理发,那么他是否为自己理发?”简单的不能再简单了,于是数学家开始恐慌。一位偶记不起来名字的数学家,跑到出版商那里把自己的将要出版的著作抢回,悲哀的说:“我的毕生心血,都被证明为无意义。”罗素悖论后来导致了公理化集合论的产生,不过这个偶没研究过。
      一句话推翻整个学说?呵呵,有意思的是,罗素先生穷一生之力辛辛苦苦建立起来的逻辑原子主义大厦,又被一名叫做Frank Ramsey的孩子推翻了,也是用一句话。
      [对逻辑不感兴趣的朋友请忽略下面这节]
      弗兰克·拉姆塞很小的时候(好象是18岁?)就开始翻译维特根斯坦的《逻辑哲学论》,后来在剑桥大学他成为维氏的导师(晕,这都是什么关系嘛)。逻辑原子主义的基本前提之一是:所有原子命题都是不可分割的;基本前提之二是:原子命题之间没有逻辑关系,也就是逻辑命题A为真或为假,绝不可能说明逻辑命题B的真或假。例如,维特根斯坦的《逻辑哲学论》里有一句话:“在视域的一个位置上同时显示两种颜色是不可能的,而且是逻辑上的不可能,因为它为颜色的逻辑结构所排斥。”这句话就是某种意义上想说明原子命题之间是独立的。但是拉姆塞问道:我给出一个位置Position p1,定义命题A为:p1是红色的;定义命题B为:p1是绿色的。它们都是原子命题吧?A为真则B必为假,B为真则A必为假──谁说原子命题之间是独立的?!
      对了,稍提一下,罗素还获得过诺贝尔文学奖。那个时代的剑桥大学三一学院,简直就是天才大本营。

      6, 计算机科学家:阿兰·图灵
      Alan Turing是个怪人。跟维特根斯坦一样,他也是一位同性恋。《Expert C Programming》一书说,1939年欧洲爆发的时候,为了防止货币贬值,阿兰·图灵把自己所有的积蓄换成了一个大银块,埋在了某个乡村的一棵树底下。后来战争结束了,但是图灵却忘记把银子埋在哪儿了。
      图灵最终吞食了一个注射了氰化物的苹果自杀。

      7, 计算机科学家与工程师:Dennis M. Ritchie
      DMR以C语言之父与半个Unix之父的身份著称。但是DMR上大学本科的时候,学的是物理而不是计算机。通过本科的学习,他发现自己不够聪明,不能成为一名合格的物理学家,于是研究生改学计算机;攻读硕士研究生的时候,DMR又发现自己不够聪明,不能成为合格的算法专家,于是改学程序设计。于是设计出了C语言,和部分Unix操作系统。
      第一等的人才,必然能够清晰的认识自己适合什么,不适合什么。

      8, 语言学家与哲学家诺曼·乔姆斯基
      Noam Chomsky在语言学上的地位毋庸多说,同时,他也是我们CS专业的人应该记住名字的人。20世纪50年代的时候,为了对抗结构主义的语言学说(可能偶很崇拜的索绪尔也包括在内),乔姆斯基开始发展他的转换-生成语言学理论,并最终使得语言学在西方高校中成为与传统的数学、物理、文学等并驾齐驱的一门科学。文法中著名的乔姆斯基层次(0型文法,对应短语结构语言;1型文法,对应上下文相关语言;2型文法,对应上下文无关语言;3型文法,对应正则语言。其中每一个都是前一个的真子集)对计算机的编译科学领域产生了重要影响,以至于有人把他和冯·诺依曼一起并称为计算机之父(至于谁这么干的偶就不记得了)。
      此外,乔姆斯基还是个著名的“持不同政见者”,他老兄抨击美国政府最起劲,他有一句名言:“美国是当今世界头号恐怖主义者。”

      9, 哲学家马丁·海德格尔
      Martin Heidegger是一个严肃到令人震撼的思想家。他和维特根斯坦都出生于1889年,都讲德语(海氏是德国人,维氏是奥地利人),各自在自己所属的领域(海氏在欧洲大陆现象学/存在哲学,维氏在英美分析哲学)独冠群雄。海德格尔这人的生活比较有意思,最为人津津乐道的是,作为一名思维缜密的思想家,他老兄竟然在1933年就任弗莱堡大学的校长,公开支持纳粹,发表了臭名昭著的《德国大学的自我宣言》。这件事偶一直不理解。总有些人想给这件事和海氏思想之间找些“必然联系”,可是偶也算深受海氏思想毒害了,也没变成纳粹。二战结束后,海氏被禁止讲学。这时候,他的好友、正直的哲学家卡尔·雅斯贝尔斯,和二十世纪最伟大的女性思想家汉娜·阿伦特开始展开活动,为海德格尔争取解禁。他们并非认为天才有犯罪豁免权,而是太清楚地知道海德格尔的思想对于我们这个时代有着什么样子的意义。
      海德格尔反科学反技术到了深入骨髓的程度,偶当年读他的著作就一个感觉:自己以前的所有思想都在渐渐被他颠覆、渗透。后来他的夫人为他在托特瑙堡的深林里建立了一个小木屋,海氏躲进其中思考,一下子就是后半生。
      如果允许偶僭越地说一句偶本没资格说的话,那就是:自古希腊泰勒斯以来,马丁·海德格尔是整个希伯来-地中海诞生出的西方文明中,最为优秀的哲学家。

      10, 哲学家叔本华
      叔本华是个怪物,哲学家和文学家。他老兄的时代,还没有谁能够看出西方自启蒙运动以来的精神/文化危机,他却能嗅到这一气息。举世都傻而你独聪明,那是不会有好下场的,叔本华就是这样。他老兄郁郁不得志,免费给某个大学讲课,自负的把自己的课程安排在跟黑格尔同一个时间。结果呢?大家全跑去听黑格尔了,没人理叔本华。郁闷久了,叔本华说:“要么是我配不上我的时代,要么是这个时代配不上我。”等到晚年,叔本华预言过的危机一一开始出现,人们才想起来:哦,这家伙是个天才!
      叔本华一生都看不起女人(不过还没象尼采那样严重,后者在《查拉图斯特拉如是说》一书中有句极其恶毒的话:“你去女人那里吗?别忘了你的鞭子。”)但是叔本华死后,别人发现他的书中夹着一张梅毒的疗方,呵呵。

      11, 几位古希腊哲学家
      对古希腊了解不多,只好凭记忆乱说。
      古希腊哲学家都很有个性。泰勒斯被认为是西方哲学的始祖,传说他以相似三角形理论测量过金字塔的高度,预测了日食的发生而阻止了一场战争,仰观天文时掉在臭水沟里而为婢女嘲笑……太多太多;苏格拉底大家都知道,可是罕为人知的是他娶了一位悍妻,而且自豪的说:“如果最劣性的马你都能驯服,还有什么马不能骑?”;传说恩培多克勒跳进了火山口;赫拉克里特以贵族的身份躲进森林里吃树皮草根,直至饿死;斯多葛学派的远祖Stokes说过,“我认识的人越多,就越喜欢狗。”;阿那克西曼得,巴门尼德,柏拉图,亚里士多德,毕达哥拉斯,伊壁鸠鲁,阿那克萨哥拉,阿那克西米尼……那真是个哲学的时代,呵。

      困死偶了,又冷又饿,不多说了。不过总说西方,怕被愤青冠之以“汉奸”的名号,偶还是再扯点中国的故事吧,就从前几天的文章里抄袭:

      柯绍愍(《清史稿》的主要作者之一)这个人我很喜欢。依稀记得是山东胶县人。他的最精彩的著作,当然要数《新元史》。晚清四大藏书家之一的聊城杨氏海源阁,为保证藏书的不流失制订了很多家法,但对柯绍愍这样的学者,却是非常欢迎的。柯氏之所以能写出《新元史》,恐怕也是很借助于海源阁藏书之富的。那个时代的那些人,在今日的我们已很难想见其风流了。《一士类稿》记载柯绍愍和他舅舅一起外出,遇到暴雨或泥石流什么的,他舅舅死掉了。回到家,柯绍愍风尘未洗就开卷读书,他父亲发现行李有被水浸渍的痕迹,又没见到柯绍愍的舅舅,就问他:“你舅舅呢?”问了好几遍他才听到,漫不经心地抬头说了句“死矣”又低头读书。
      你可以说这种人是畸形儿,你可以说这种人变态。但是你不能不承认,真正的读书人都有这样的“痴儿”气质。海德格尔说:“愈是伟大的大师,其个性就愈纯粹地消失于作品的背后。”又说,“大师在作品中的当前现身,乃是其唯一真实的当前现身。”(《泰然任之》。嗯,想起来了,海氏有一学期在弗莱堡大学讲授亚里士多德哲学,按照惯例是先讲述哲学家的平生,而海德格尔只说了一句话:“亚里士多德出生,工作,死去。”就算是介绍了其平生,然后讲述了整整一学期的亚里士多德哲学)我说,真正的读书人从来都不在生活中读书,而只在读书中生活。

      偶们是凡人,无法想象大师们如何能够活得如此之洒脱。偶坚信,读了《丘吉尔传》就可以说自己懂丘吉尔,读了《周恩来传》就可以说自己懂周恩来……但是要有资格说自己懂爱因斯坦,有资格说自己懂海德格尔,那是看几百本《XXX传》都不行的,而必须深入了解其思想……
      天才并非是自生自长在山林里的怪物,中国并不缺少天才,缺少的是培养天才的土壤,鲁迅说。偶试想一下,倘若维特根斯坦生在现代中国,他要赚钱糊口,要办理各种麻烦的手续,要经常被客户蹂躏,要写没技术含量的代码,要考虑找女朋友、买房……要做的事太多了,不知道他还能否继续茁壮成长为“天才”。。。

                                       albcamus
                           2005年11月06日,凌晨4点半

    Tags: 罗素 维特根斯坦 海德格尔 雅斯贝尔斯 叔本华

    By 十三团 at 2005-11-12 02:30 | 神学与哲学 | 2 comments

    天才之间---罗素和维特根斯坦(转贴)

    ●罗素和维特根斯坦的师徒关系从来就有点不一般,与其说是名义上的师徒关系,还不如说是事实上的互为师徒关系。

    ●罗素的文字有一种恐怕想学也学不来的幽默机智,堪称典范,他获得诺贝尔文学奖大概可以证明这一点,据我所知,罗素是不靠文学作品(小说和诗)而获得诺贝尔文学奖的两个人之一。

    ●维特根斯坦还是个勇敢的士兵,他的战友回忆说,有一次对方的炮火打得大家东躲西藏,只有维特根斯坦在继续干活。

    ●天才有时候不一定知道自己是天才,但一定知道另一个天才是天才。有一次维特根斯坦跑来让罗素判断他是天才还是傻冒:“如果是傻冒,我就去开飞艇;如果是天才,我就会成为哲学家”,结果罗素告诉他无论如何不用去开飞艇。

    ●有一次,维特根斯坦对罗素再版《数学原理》评论说,《数学原理》有许多错误,靠出一个新版本也无济于事。

    ●维特根斯坦的苛刻是一种非常认真公正的态度。有一次罗素在学术会议上对“几个傻瓜”保持礼貌,结果维特根斯坦义愤填膺,认为罗素没有当面告诉那几个傻瓜他们是多么愚蠢,是一种缺德的世故。

      父子都是大师的情况不多见,如果有,就几乎一定是子不如父;但师徒都是天才的事情却比比皆是。罗素和维特根斯坦就是师徒天才。不过,在重要的哲学家里,摩尔也应该算是维特根斯坦的老师,维特根斯坦在1912年到剑桥上学,同时听罗素和摩尔的课。罗素和维特根斯坦的师徒关系从来就有点不一般,与其说是名义上的师徒关系,还不如说是事实上的互为师徒关系。在天才的朋友之间,互为师徒关系其实很正常。在《逻辑哲学论》的序言里,维特根斯坦在谈到所受的影响时说他“只想提到”弗莱格和罗素;罗素则说过“维特根斯坦的理论对我有深刻的影响”(《我的哲学的发展》P.112)

      罗素无疑是本世纪最重要的哲学家之一,但应该说不如维特根斯坦那么伟大。不过,有着特别的自豪感的英国人可能不以为然,英国哲学家艾耶尔在一本讨论维特根斯坦的书中有过如此有趣的赞叹:维特根斯坦如此伟大,以至于成为仅次于罗素的哲学家。

      罗素的才华不仅超群,而且像他这个人一样多彩。按照中国的说法叫做“多才多艺”。罗素同时是伟大的数学家、逻辑学家、哲学家和文学家以及社会评论家,严格说来,作为数学———逻辑学家的罗素比作为哲学家的罗素要重要得多,他在数学———逻辑上的成就几乎是划时代的,他是数学中“逻辑派”的领袖,尽管他的一个基本看法———数学可以完全由现代逻辑来说明———现在看来非常可能是错误的。罗素的文字有一种恐怕想学也学不来的幽默机智,堪称典范,他获得诺贝尔文学奖大概可以证明这一点,据我所知,罗素是不靠文学作品(小说和诗)而获得诺贝尔文学奖的两个人之一(另一个是柏格森)。

      罗素同样喜欢数学和哲学,但最早喜欢的是数学,原因是这样的:罗素小时候,家里气氛十分严肃,特别讲究规矩和清教徒的美德,而且不许怀疑,于是罗素只好去喜欢数学,理由是“数学是可以怀疑的,因为数学没有伦理内容”。可是后来还是喜欢上哲学,长辈们很不以为然,总是说:“什么是精神?那决不是物质,什么是物质?那决不是精神”。罗素在《记忆中的人物》里写道:“这句话听了五、六十遍之后,我就不觉得可乐了”。

      罗素活到90多岁还有清楚的头脑和不老的热情。有个故事说,罗素在80多岁时说他的已经90多岁的老师怀特海“真是老糊涂了”,而怀特海反过来说罗素“还是不成熟”。随便说说罗素的老师怀特海,他也是个天才,非常年轻就成了剑桥的教授。由于他是天才,所以很快就看出罗素也是天才,罗素在剑桥上大学时,怀特海来上课,对罗素说:“你不用学了,你都会了”。不久后他们由师生变成合作者,共同写作了划时代的著作《数学原理》。罗素跟数学大师哈代说他做了个梦,梦见200年后剑桥大学图书馆管理员正在把过时无用的书扔掉,当拿起《数学原理》时感到没有把握是否应该扔掉,这时把罗素急醒了。

      维特根斯坦甚至更加“多才多艺”,10岁就自己做了一台缝纫机,大了做过飞机的发动机,在数学和逻辑上也有独到的贡献,艺术造诣没得说,单簧管水平是专业的,还建过一栋楼房,设计风格在当时算是前卫的,哲学的创造性在本世纪可说是第一。至于生活,看起来比罗素更有不同寻常之处。由于维特根斯坦的生活和思想比较离奇,于是许多人对他的不同寻常有些夸张,有些进行了夸张的赞扬,更有些进行了无耻的诽谤,不过,对天才进行抵抗和批评是一种司空见惯的恶习。维特根斯坦的父亲是个亿万富翁,维特根斯坦把他所继承的遗产全部送给别人;维特根斯坦还是个
    勇敢的士兵,他的战友回忆说,有一次对方的炮火打得大家东躲西藏,只有维特根斯坦在继续干活。这样的人难道不是个伟大的人吗?

      天才有时候不一定知道自己是天才,但一定知道另一个天才是天才。有一次维特根斯坦跑来让罗素判断他是天才还是傻冒:“如果是傻冒,我就去开飞艇;如果是天才,我就会成为哲学家”,结果罗素告诉他无论如何不用去开飞艇。维特根斯坦的另一个老师摩尔也非常欣赏维特根斯坦,理由是“我在讲课时他看上去很困惑,而其他人都不是这样的”。罗素、摩尔和维特根斯坦的故事很多。维特根斯坦拿他的不朽著作《逻辑哲学论》到剑桥申请博士学位,答辩主持人是罗素和摩尔,随便聊了聊之后,罗素提问说,维特根斯坦一会说关于哲学没有什么可说的,一会又说能够有绝对真理,这是矛盾。维特根斯坦拍着他们的肩膀说:“别急,你们永远也搞不懂这一点的”。这样答辩就算结束了,罗素和摩尔一致同意通过答辩。像这样伟大浪漫的事情只有当几个伟大的人凑到一起才有可能。类似的事情还有,维特根斯坦后来拿另一本书(《哲学评论》)去申请研究基金,又归罗素来鉴定,罗素不喜欢这套新理论,他的评语大意是:这本书非常有创造性,但在他看来是错误的,然而同意给他研究经费。想想看这是什么样的胸怀。摩尔甚至可能有着更宽阔的胸怀,据说英国国王曾接见摩尔,表彰他对哲学的贡献,称赞他是头号哲学家,摩尔说,不对,维特根斯坦才是头号的。

      相比之下,维特根斯坦对待罗素和摩尔要苛刻得多,他曾经“狠狠地”批评过罗素和摩尔的理论。有一次,维特根斯坦对罗素再版《数学原理》评论说,《数学原理》有许多错误,靠出一个新版本也无济于事。在哲学上,维特根斯坦可能更看不上罗素,维特根斯坦把他的《逻辑哲学论》给弗莱格和罗素看过之后认为,弗莱格“一个字也不懂”,而罗素也好不到哪里去,罗素甚至没有理解“主要论点”。当然,维特根斯坦决不是觉得罗素特傻,显然维特根斯坦承认罗素对他的影响,只不过他觉得像罗素这样聪明的人都居然没有理解他的新思想,是一件令人失望的事情。而且,
    维特根斯坦的苛刻是一种非常认真公正的态度。有一次罗素在学术会议上对“几个傻瓜”保持礼貌,结果维特根斯坦义愤填膺,认为罗素没有当面告诉那几个傻瓜他们是多么愚蠢,是一种缺德的世故。

      这些伟大的人物,伟大人物之间的伟大关系,实在令人神往,想着就让人觉得舒服。中国民谚也说:“好汉敬好汉”,果然如此,在好汉之间,各种真正伟大的价值才会被认为是伟大的,各种不同一般的行为才会被理解和欣赏。可惜这种伟大的事情在生活中太少了。古希腊哲学家赫拉克利特早就发现小人们不喜欢优秀的人,例子是:爱非斯人赶走了他们中间最优秀的人,并且说“我们中间不要优秀的人,如果有,让他到别处去,到别人中间去吧”。

      现在我想谈谈罗素和维特根斯坦在哲学上的根本区别。人们一般更多地注意到他们思想的联系,通常认为他们在思想上毕竟有许多相似的地方,因此他们都算是“分析哲学家”。可是,维特根斯坦为什么觉得他的哲学是完全不同的另一种东西,以至于罗素不能理解?而且,维特根斯坦虽然被分析哲学家们奉为宗师,但是维特根斯坦恐怕不会认为他和分析哲学家是一伙。我想是这样的:维特根斯坦哲学的许多细节确实被罗素和其他分析哲学家所接受和利用,但是在哲学的主旨上却完全不同,结果,分析哲学是一种没有包含维特根斯坦思想主旨的哲学。所以维特根斯坦才会觉得罗素等人误解了他的主要观点(而不是细节)。可以说,分析哲学以为,对事物的逻辑的和科学的描述本身包含着一种哲学观点,而维特根斯坦则认为这种逻辑的和科学的描述恰恰只是逻辑的和科学的观点而并非同时是一种哲学观点,哲学只不过是一种让逻辑的归逻辑、让科学的归科学、让某种事情归某种事情的活动,是一种“把帐一笔一笔算清”的活动而已。维特根斯坦甚至认为:“没有一种方法是哲学的方法,虽然有各种方法,就像有不同的疗法”(《哲学研究》133节)。至于那些无法算清的、也就是不可说的东西就不用去说了———其中也许至少有一部分可以给予宗教性的敬意。

      随便一说,我相信所谓后期维特根斯坦的思想并没有通常想象的那样完全不同。原来维特根斯坦只是要求看清楚语言,后来进一步要求看清楚所有的“生活形式”(包括语言)。维特根斯坦的口号“要看不要想”意味着看清楚一切之后哲学问题就消失了。

    漫画一 
    维特根斯坦问罗素:“我是不是白痴?如果是,我就不搞哲学了,而去开飞艇。” 

    漫画二 
    维特根斯坦要求哲学家先治好自己的病,可是等他给自己治完病,我们又都着凉了。

    转贴自http://www.gmw.cn/01ds/1998-02/11/GB/185^DS1604.htm

    延伸阅读
    維根斯坦的火鏟 

    卡尔·波普尔 

    Tags: 罗素 维特根斯坦 逻辑哲学 语言哲学 维也纳学派 证伪主义 卡尔.波普尔

    By 十三团 at 2005-10-10 03:18 | 12 comments

    分形之父--芒德勃罗答问(转贴)

    芒德勃罗答问
      

      ●“我的名字列在曼德拉和毛泽东之间”(芒德勃罗)

      ●“谁不知道熵概念就不能被认为是科学上的文化人,将来谁不知道分形概念,也不能称为有知识。”(物理学家惠勒)

      ●想了解芒氏有多出名,请上因特网,用YAHOO!检索输入关键词Mandelbrot,你一定有不少收获。

    ●“谁不知道熵概念就不能被认为是科学上的文化人,将来谁不知道分形概念,也不能称为有知识。”(物理学家惠勒)

      ●想了解芒氏有多出名,请上因特网,用YAHOO!检索输入关键词Mandelbrot,你一定有不少收获。

    ●“谁不知道熵概念就不能被认为是科学上的文化人,将来谁不知道分形概念,也不能称为有知识。”(物理学家惠勒)

      ●想了解芒氏有多出名,请上因特网,用YAHOO!检索输入关键词Mandelbrot,你一定有不少收获。

      芒德勃罗(BenoitB.Mandelbrot)1924年11月20日生于波兰华沙,祖籍立陶宛,犹太人。分形理论的创始人,IBM研究员,耶鲁大学数学教授,曾获物理学沃尔
    夫奖。其名著《大自然的分形几何学》将由上海远东出版社出版。

     问(刘华杰):很高兴读到你寄来的巴塞罗斯(AnthonyBarcelos)写的访谈。通过郝柏林等科学家的介绍,中国许多研究人员早就开始研究分形,学生们也通过各种课程学习有关理论和技术。但我认为与此同时,也应当将分形理论的曲折发展史介绍给中国学生,这对他们很有启发。

      我现在正在写一部关于您的小传,有些难找的资料需请教您。

      我只知道您是1955年结婚的,您能谈谈您的妻子(我在北京见过)和孩子吗?我也很想知道您家族的一些情况。这些信息对我的写作有好处,未必与学术思想有关,但可以帮助读者从不同的方面理解您这位学术领袖。

      答(芒德勃罗):我妻子及我本人的家族中大部分成员是商人或者神职人员。这一切可以上溯到18世纪,其中几个是很有影响的人物。在我们这一代里,一大批人是研究学问的,有几个非常杰出。我经常开玩笑说,与我们的儿子有血缘关系的这些人足以支撑起一所相当不错的大学。

      除了那个有名的叔叔佐列姆外,我家里还有一个亲戚在巴黎大学任物理化学教授,另一个在马赛利(Marseille)大学任物理学教授(他还是一名画家)。还有一个兄弟任一家重要报纸的主编。

      我妻子原名叫卡甘(Kagan)。在她母亲那一支,她属于一个出了许多名人的叫做崔岭(Trilling)的家族。她的兄弟都是大学的化学教授,一个是法兰西学院的院士。她的一个堂兄过去是伯克利的物理教授,现在是美国国家科学院院士,另一个堂兄是麻省理工学院的工程教授。

      我大儿子叫劳拉(Laurent),现在是巴黎一家医学院的妇科教授。小儿子叫迪德(Didier),任哈佛医学院讲师。

      问:请问我到哪能够找到您1952年的博士论文的英文简介?关于此论文有不少传说,我只知道其大致的内容。

      我在1988年读本科时就注意到维纳(NorbertWiener)在其名著《人有人的用途》(商务印书馆有中译本)中两次提到您在语言学和噪声方面的工作。您过去见过维纳吗?

      答:我的博士论文从未以英文形式发表过。不过我可以告诉你为什么它被划为应用数学类。当时我把论文给卡斯特勒(AlfredKastler)教授看,他是我叔叔的朋友,后来荣获诺贝尔物理学奖。他开玩笑地说,论题的前半部分不存在(他说得对,论题是数理语言学),而另半部分已经死掉了(他错了,论题是统计热力学,不久又活跃起来了)。

      维纳与我叔叔既是同事又是朋友。我在1948年遇见他,当时他的名著《控制论》(科学出版社有中译本)刚出版,我能经常碰到他。但是,我的博士后工作是跟普林斯顿大学高等研究院的冯·诺伊曼(vonNeumann)做的。

      问:您被授予诸多奖励和奖章,您能按其重要程度排列一下顺序吗?

      答:我寄给你的简历中详细列出了奖项和荣誉学位。每一项奖励对我来说都有特殊意义。此次我又寄去几份与此有关的文件。

      也许我应该提及两项古怪的通常很少提到的事情。1993年《星期日泰晤士报》(伦敦)列出“20世纪的1000位缔造者”,我的名字按字母顺序列在曼德拉(NelsonMandela)和毛泽东之间。1995年法国《新观察家》(LeNouvelObservateur)周刊列出“世界上50位最有影响的人物”,我的名字也包括在其中。

      问:您在自然科学、经济学和艺术中做出了许多贡献,也许最大的贡献是开创了“分形”科学,您能概括地谈谈您的具体贡献吗?列出几项即可。

      答:沃尔夫奖(WolfPrize)的评语认为我的分形理论“改变了我们的世界观”。麻省理工学院经济学教授萨缪尔逊(PaulA.Samuelson)评论我的论金融的论文时说:“芒德勃罗是一个极富创造力的学者,经济学家已经受惠于他的洞见。在为推动经济学进步做出重要贡献的非经济学家的排行榜中,芒德勃罗的名字仅次于冯·诺伊曼。”

      有人认为我的工作对数学教学产生了重要影响。

      我不太清楚你所说的“具体”是什么意思。

      问:中国给您留下什么印象?这也许是一个很可笑的问题。

      答:我的最强烈的印象是中国的人民,我觉得你们是东欧人甚至西欧人的极接近的亲戚,甚至比日本人、马来亚人和印度人更接近于欧洲人。当然,中国的传统建筑不同于欧洲。北京故宫巨大的规模、香港繁荣的经济都超出了我的想象。
    转贴自 http://www.gmw.cn/01ds/1998-02/11/GB/185^DS1207.htm

    Tags: 分形 混沌学 chaos 芒德勃罗 经济学 http:www.best-casinos-payouts.in http:www.best-casinoonline.info http:www.casinos-top-list.info http:www.poker-online-sites.info http:www.blay65.com

    By 十三团 at 2005-10-10 03:03 | 数学 | 6 comments

    跟着老冒说idea---关于idea、关于商业创意的商业价值

    最近因为自己想创业,以商业计划聚集一些合伙人,而又苦于不清楚应该把含有商业创意的这个计划公开到何种程度。注意到老冒在其一篇文章中说道:idea不值钱....
    (先开个题,有空了来写--也督促自己,哈哈)

    Tags: idea 商业创意 知识产权

    Alan Turing, Mathematician

    Alan Turing
    Source
    Alan Turing, Mathematician

    • Born: 23 June 1912
    • Birthplace: London, England
    • Died: 7 June 1954 (Probable suicide by cyanide poisoning)
    • Best Known As: Pioneer in computers and artificial intelligence

    Name at birth: Alan Mathison Turing

    Alan Turing was a mathematician who in 1937 suggested a theoretical machine, since called a Turing Machine, that became the basis of modern computing. In 1950 he suggested what has become known as a "Turing's test," still the criterion for recognizing intelligence in a machine. During World War II Turing led the team that succeeded in breaking German high-level secret codes, using the first practical programmed computer, called Colossus. Turing was a homosexual, a crime in England at the time, and in 1952 he was tried, convicted and sentenced to estrogen treatments. In 1954 he died of cyanide poisoning, an apparent suicide.

    Turing was also an accomplished competitive runner.

    Nano Layer Deposition; Unique Thin Film Deposition Technology Surpasses Atomic Layer Deposition in Flexibility

    The systems and methods described in the '220 and the '318 enable nano layer deposition with ultra-conformality comparable to that of atomic layer deposition (ALD) and the manufacturing throughput of more conventional chemical vapor deposition (CVD) systems. NLD allows semiconductor manufacturers to choose from a wide field of deposition precursors (a key limitation of ALD) for the application of any thin film in use today on the surface of a wafer with atomic layer precision. NLD technology can also be used to construct complex, compound film structures with a level of control and conformality that was previously unavailable or impractical.

    The '220 patent covers a system and process incorporating a pulsed plasma and deposition technique applicable to a variety of films such as Titanium Nitride, Copper and several low-K (dielectric constant) insulating films. The pulsing technique can also be used to deposit a low-K material and to "seal" it in-situ in order to preserve the film's low-K properties. This has been a major limitation to the successful implementation of low-K dielectric materials into current generations of semiconductors.

    The '318 patent combines system design, source design and NLD technology to enable a manufacturing solution for next generation semiconductor devices. The '318 discloses a new helical ribbon electrode as a plasma source for use in an NLD system. The '318 patent builds on the technology disclosed in the '220 patent and provides a multi-chamber platform for performing a wide variety of processing steps such as pre-clean, etch, NLD, densification, etc. As a result, complex films can be deposited with complete conformality and layer thicknesses can be controlled to one monolayer or to several hundred of Angstroms.

    The market for highly conformal deposition tools, such as ALD and NLD, is one of the fastest-growing segments of the semiconductor device manufacturing space. According to VLSI Research Inc., the current market for highly conformal deposition tools is over US$100 million and will grow at an annual rate of over 66% to reach US$1.35 billion in 2008.

    "We are pleased to add these two key patents to Tegal's extensive base of intellectual property and know-how," said Michael Parodi, Tegal chairman, president & CEO. "This is one of the most exciting areas that Tegal has ever participated in, and we look forward to demonstrating the superiority of our NLD systems in the market."

    Safe Harbor Statement

    Except for historical information, matters discussed in this news release contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements, which are based on assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by the use of the words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "project" or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about the company including, but not limited to industry conditions, economic conditions, acceptance of new technologies and market acceptance of the company's products and services. All forward-looking statements attributable to the company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements in this paragraph. For a further discussion of these risks and uncertainties, please refer to the company's periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Harvesting Solar Energy From Nano-Thin Films

    Harvesting Solar Energy From Nano-Thin Films

    By Grace Jean

    Researchers at the U.S. Army Soldier Systems Center in Natick, Mass., are developing prototypes of battery chargers and shelters that would harness solar energy through nanocomposite thin-film photovoltaics.

    “It’s really an exciting time right now, because there are a number of new photovoltaic technologies out there trying to drive down costs, allowing you to use them in ways that couldn’t be used before,” said Lynne Samuelson, a research chemist at Natick.

    Photovoltaic technology has advanced from the large, heavy and expensive glass panels into smaller, lightweight and cheaper devices.

    “Up until the last few years, those technologies weren’t of interest to the military,” said Samuelson. But now, she said, power is a number one priority for soldiers who carry an increasing amount of electronic equipment. They need something lightweight and portable to charge those devices, she said.

    Her research team has produced thin-film photovoltaics, or PVs, that could eventually answer that call.

    The thin-film PVs are made by coating nanoparticles of titanium dioxide with a light-harvesting dye and sandwiching them between two plastic-based electrodes, said Samuelson. The resulting device has the thickness of three sheets of paper. When light comes through the device, it hits the dye and an electron gets shuttled through the titanium dioxide to the other electrode. A redux mediator keeps the process running, she said.

    The sheets of PVs can be cut to any length or width, she said. The longer the device, the more current it will produce. If you need to charge up a radio, for example, you know the watts and amps required, and you could design a PV to meet that specific requirement, she said.

    The goal for these devices is to generate 30 watts per pound, said Samuelson. Soldiers currently use a battery, BA5590, that produces about 22 watts per pound. With the nanocomposite thin-film PVs, “you’re providing a higher density, and it’s renewable,” said Samuelson.

    Within the next year, these films will be incorporated into handheld battery-charger prototypes capable of recharging four AA batteries in two hours, said Samuelson. In the next two years, the team will incorporate the films into shelters as well.

    “What’s nice about this technology is you can do some unique things with it that you can’t do with traditional materials,” said Samuelson. For example, making a camouflage-pattern photovoltaic.

    “Because we’re using a light-harvesting dye, we can make colored patterns,” she explained. “We can inkjet-print these dyes easily to make camouflage-colored PVs without having to put a mesh over it,” she added.

    Her team is also working on converting the thin-film PVs into fibers that could be weaved directly into textiles.

    “It would make all the applications we’re already going after even better,” she said.

    Mars Underground

    Mars Underground

    Most of the news we get from Mars is in the form of photos from the surface or from space. This week's story in TIME is one good example. So is this one. But earlier today, space scientists announced different sort of imagery, invisible to the human eye, which reveals what's lies beneath the Martian surface. No, not water--the radar instrument aboard the Mars Express orbiter can't pick that up, if it's there.

    But the radar did find buried impact craters in droves. Mars has plenty of visible craters, but the majority lie in its southern hemisphere; the north is relatively smooth. Under that smoothness, though, is a rough, ancient surface that was long ago overlaid with lava flows and with sediment laid down by ancient seas. It's the first time this sort of radar map has ever been made (Venus has been mapped with radar too, but only the surface, not the subsurface.

    — M.L.

    Goodbye, Arctic Icecap

    Goodbye, Arctic Icecap

    A little over a year ago, this report cited four years of unusual summer melting in sea ice that covers most of the Arctic Ocean and concluded that this northern sea could be completely ice-free--North Pole included--"well before the end of the century."

    But this year's numbers, just  presented at the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union, suggest  that things have sped up. The ice didn't melt back quite as much as in 2005, the worst summer on record. But 2006 was still pretty bad--and while the ice is now refreezing as winter approaches, there's less ice than the historical norm by an area about the size of Alaska. When you plug all the data into computer simulations, they suggest that the summer ice could disappear completely a lot sooner than anyone thought--possibly within just 40 years, and possibly with very little warning. That's because as the sea ice melts in summer, warmer water can more easily flow into the Arctic. Open water also reflects a lot less sunlight than ice does, which lets the sun warm things up more as more water shows. That creates a feedback loop--more water means more heat means even more water means even more heat....until, in just one especially warm summer, the ice could vanish, and not return.

    It's all just one more suggestion that global warming is very real, and that the effects could lead to sudden changes, not just gradual ones. If the Arctic ice disappears, it might be good for shipping--after all, a Northwest Passage to the Pacific was one of the prime economic motives for exploring northern North America--but wildlife (polar bears, seals) would be devastated. And the global climate effects could be pretty devastating as well, since such a major change could dramatically alter weather patterns.

    — M.L.

    December 13

    Why a hydrogen economy doesn't make sense

    Why a hydrogen economy doesn't make sense 

    Why a hydrogen economy doesn't make sense

    This chart compares the useful transport energy requirements for a vehicle powered from a hydrogen process (left) vs. electricity (right). Image Credit: Ulf Bossel.
    In a recent study, fuel cell expert Ulf Bossel explains that a hydrogen economy is a wasteful economy. The large amount of energy required to isolate hydrogen from natural compounds (water, natural gas, biomass), package the light gas by compression or liquefaction, transfer the energy carrier to the user, plus the energy lost when it is converted to useful electricity with fuel cells, leaves around 25% for practical use — an unacceptable value to run an economy in a sustainable future. Only niche applications like submarines and spacecraft might use hydrogen.


    “More energy is needed to isolate hydrogen from natural compounds than can ever be recovered from its use,” Bossel explains to PhysOrg.com. “Therefore, making the new chemical energy carrier form natural gas would not make sense, as it would increase the gas consumption and the emission of CO2. Instead, the dwindling fossil fuel reserves must be replaced by energy from renewable sources.”

    While scientists from around the world have been piecing together the technology, Bossel has taken a broader look at how realistic the use of hydrogen for carrying energy would be. His overall energy analysis of a hydrogen economy demonstrates that high energy losses inevitably resulting from the laws of physics mean that a hydrogen economy will never make sense.

    “The advantages of hydrogen praised by journalists (non-toxic, burns to water, abundance of hydrogen in the Universe, etc.) are misleading, because the production of hydrogen depends on the availability of energy and water, both of which are increasingly rare and may become political issues, as much as oil and natural gas are today,” says Bossel.

    “There is a lot of money in the field now,” he continues. “I think that it was a mistake to start with a ‘Presidential Initiative’ rather with a thorough analysis like this one. Huge sums of money were committed too soon, and now even good scientists prostitute themselves to obtain research money for their students or laboratories—otherwise, they risk being fired. But the laws of physics are eternal and cannot be changed with additional research, venture capital or majority votes.”

    Even though many scientists, including Bossel, predict that the technology to establish a hydrogen economy is within reach, its implementation will never make economic sense, Bossel argues.

    “In the market place, hydrogen would have to compete with its own source of energy, i.e. with ("green") electricity from the grid,” he says. “For this reason, creating a new energy carrier is a no-win solution. We have to solve an energy problem not an energy carrier problem."

    A wasteful process

    In his study, Bossel analyzes a variety of methods for synthesizing, storing and delivering hydrogen, since no single method has yet proven superior. To start, hydrogen is not naturally occurring, but must be synthesized.

    “Ultimately, hydrogen has to be made from renewable electricity by electrolysis of water in the beginning,” Bossel explains, “and then its energy content is converted back to electricity with fuel cells when it’s recombined with oxygen to water. Separating hydrogen from water by electrolysis requires massive amounts of electrical energy and substantial amounts of water.”

    Also, hydrogen is not a source of energy, but only a carrier of energy. As a carrier, it plays a role similar to that of water in a hydraulic heating system or electrons in a copper wire. When delivering hydrogen, whether by truck or pipeline, the energy costs are several times that for established energy carriers like natural gas or gasoline. Even the most efficient fuel cells cannot recover these losses, Bossel found. For comparison, the "wind-to-wheel" efficiency is at least three times greater for electric cars than for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.

    Another headache is storage. When storing liquid hydrogen, some gas must be allowed to evaporate for safety reasons—meaning that after two weeks, a car would lose half of its fuel, even when not being driven. Also, Bossel found that the output-input efficiency cannot be much above 30%, while advanced batteries have a cycle efficiency of above 80%. In every situation, Bossel found, the energy input outweighs the energy delivered by a factor of three to four.

    “About four renewable power plants have to be erected to deliver the output of one plant to stationary or mobile consumers via hydrogen and fuel cells,” he writes. “Three of these plants generate energy to cover the parasitic losses of the hydrogen economy while only one of them is producing useful energy.”

    This fact, he shows, cannot be changed with improvements in technology. Rather, the one-quarter efficiency is based on necessary processes of a hydrogen economy and the properties of hydrogen itself, e.g. its low density and extremely low boiling point, which increase the energy cost of compression or liquefaction and the investment costs of storage.

    The alternative: An electron economy

    Economically, the wasteful hydrogen process translates to electricity from hydrogen and fuel cells costing at least four times as much as electricity from the grid. In fact, electricity would be much more efficiently used if it were sent directly to the appliances instead. If the original electricity could be directly supplied by wires, as much as 90% could be used in applications.

    “The two key issues of a secure and sustainable energy future are harvesting energy from renewable sources and finding the highest energy efficiency from source to service,” he says. “Among these possibilities, biomethane [which is already being used to fuel cars in some areas] is an important, but only limited part of the energy equation. Electricity from renewable sources will play the dominant role.”

    To Bossel, this means focusing on the establishment of an efficient “electron economy.” In an electron economy, most energy would be distributed with highest efficiency by electricity and the shortest route in an existing infrastructure could be taken. The efficiency of an electron economy is not affected by any wasteful conversions from physical to chemical and from chemical to physical energy. In contrast, a hydrogen economy is based on two such conversions (electrolysis and fuel cells or hydrogen engines).

    “An electron economy can offer the shortest, most efficient and most economical way of transporting the sustainable ‘green’ energy to the consumer,” he says. “With the exception of biomass and some solar or geothermal heat, wind, water, solar, geothermal, heat from waste incineration, etc. become available as electricity. Electricity could provide power for cars, comfortable temperature in buildings, heat, light, communication, etc.

    “In a sustainable energy future, electricity will become the prime energy carrier. We now have to focus our research on electricity storage, electric cars and the modernization of the existing electricity infrastructure.”

    Citation: Bossel, Ulf. “Does a Hydrogen Economy Make Sense?” Proceedings of the IEEE. Vol. 94, No. 10, October 2006.

    By Lisa Zyga, Copyright 2006 Physorg.com

    Thomas Edison

    Thomas Edison
    Source
    Thomas Edison, Inventor

    • Born: 11 February 1847
    • Birthplace: Milan, Ohio
    • Died: 18 October 1931 (natural causes)
    • Best Known As: The man who invented the light bulb

    Name at birth: Thomas Alva Edison

    Thomas Edison was the great genius inventor of the electrical age, a man whose hundreds of inventions made him a public giant in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Among Edison's most famous inventions are the first practical long-lasting light bulb and the phonograph; he also helped refine and develop other inventions like motion picture cameras, the stock ticker and the typewriter. By the end of his life Edison had registered 1093 patents and had made millions from his inventions and the businesses he built on them. He is especially known for his work with electricity, and the story of his struggles to find the right filament for the first working light bulb are legendary. Edison's labs were located in Menlo Park, New Jersey, leading to his nickname of "The Wizard of Menlo Park." Edison is also famous for being a dogged worker: he often slept no more than four hours per night and made the famous statement, "Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration."

    Edison became close friends with another inventor/businessman, Henry Ford -- the two often vacationed together and had adjoining winter homes in Fort Myers, Florida... Edison's name lives on in several modern companies including Consolidated Edison ("Con-Ed")... Edison had a public rivalry with another electrical genius, Nikola Tesla... Louis Lumiére is another man who helped make movies a part of modern life.

     

    John F. Kennedy, U.S. President

    John F. Kennedy
    View Poster
    John F. Kennedy, U.S. President

    • Born: 29 May 1917
    • Birthplace: Brookline, Massachusetts
    • Died: 22 November 1963 (assassination by gunshot)
    • Best Known As: President of the United States, 1961-63

    John F. Kennedy's 1963 assassination was one of the most shocking public events of the 20th century. Kennedy served in the U.S. Navy during World War II, commanding the patrol boat PT-109 and leading his crew to rescue after the boat was sunk by the Japanese in the Solomon Islands. A Democrat, "JFK" was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives from Massachusetts' 11th district in 1946. In 1952 he moved up to the U.S. Senate, defeating Henry Cabot Lodge. He married Jacqueline Bouvier on 12 September 1953; they had two children, Caroline (b. 1957) and John Jr. (b. 1960). (A third child, Patrick, was born on 7 August 1963 and died two days later.) JFK was elected to replace President Dwight Eisenhower in 1960 (narrowly defeating Eisenhower's vice-president, Richard Nixon); he swept into office with a reputation for youthful charm, impatience, wit and vigor. Kennedy's term was sometimes called the New Frontier, a phrase he coined in his acceptance speech at the 1960 Democratic convention. Kennedy was shot to death by sniper Lee Harvey Oswald during an open-car motorcade in Dallas, Texas on 22 November 1963; two days later, Harvey was shot and killed by another man, Jack Ruby. Kennedy was succeeded by Lyndon Johnson.

    Kennedy was sometimes called by his nickname, Jack... U.S. senators Ted Kennedy and the late Robert F. Kennedy are Kennedy's younger brothers... His son John Kennedy Jr. died in a 1999 private plane crash... His older brother Joe Kennedy Jr. and his sister Kathleen were also killed in plane crashes during the 1940s... His father Joseph Kennedy was a controversial businessman and former ambassador to Great Britain... Kennedy's maternal grandfather, John "Honey Fitz" Fitzgerald, was mayor of Boston...Kennedy suffered from back trouble for most of his adult life; the stiff-backed rocking chair he sometimes used in the Oval Office became a personal symbol... While recovering from two serious back operations he wrote Profiles in Courage, which won the 1957 Pulitzer Prize for biography... He also suffered from the glandular disorder Addison's Disease... Richard Nixon's running mate in 1960 was Henry Cabot Lodge, whom Kennedy defeated for senator in 1952... Kennedy attended the private school Choate and graduated from Harvard College in 1940... Kennedy was America's first Catholic president.

     

    One Small Fact

    One Small Fact

    A friend mentioned to me an interesting coincidence. Anna Politskaya was murdered on October 7. October 7 is Vladimir Putin's birthday. A present?

    and who is Anna Politskaya ?and whois Vladimir Putin's ?

    Russian journalist Anna Politskaya

    Vladimir Putin
    Source
    Vladimir Putin, Political Figure

    • Born: 7 October 1952
    • Birthplace: Leningrad, Russia (now St. Petersburg)
    • Best Known As: President of the Russian Federation, 2000-

    As the hand-picked successor of Boris Yeltsin, Vladimir Putin was elected president of the Russian Federation in 2000. After earning a law degree in 1975, Putin joined the KGB, the security force of the former Soviet Union. He spent years working primarily in East Germany, then left the service in 1991 and became active in the politics of St. Petersburg (formerly Leningrad). He was brought to Moscow by Yeltsin in 1996 and served as an administrator in the Kremlin and an official for the security organizations which replaced the KGB. In 1999 Putin became Yeltsin's fifth prime minister in 17 months, then became acting president when Yeltsin left office. He was officially elected to the office in 2000 and then re-elected in a landslide vote in March of 2004.

     

    The Case Against Lawyers万恶律师为首

    万恶律师为首(英文原版进口)(硬皮精装)

     

    As a child, Catherine Crier was enchanted by film portrayals of crusading lawyers like Clarence Darrow and Atticus Finch. As a district attorney, private lawyer, and judgeherself, she saw firsthand how the United States justice system worked--and didn't. One of the most respected Iegal journalists and commentators today, she now confronts a profoundly unfair legal system that produces results and profits for the few--and paralysis, frustration, and injustice for the many. Alexis de Tocqueville's dire prediction in Democracy in America has come true: We Americans have ceded the resolution of society's problems--our fundamental responsibility as citizens--to "legal authorities," and in doing so have given up precious democratic freedoms. .
    The Case Against Lawyers is both an angry indictment and an eloquent plea for a return to common sense. It decries a system of laws so complex that even their enforcers--such as the IRS--cannot understand them. It unmasks a litigation-crazed society where billion:dollar judgments serve mostly to line the pockets of personal injury lawyers. It deplores the stupidity of a liability system that Ieads to such results as a label on a stroller warns: REMOVE CHILD BEFORE FOLDING. It indicts a criminal justice system that puts minor drug offenders away for life, yet allows celebrity murderers to walk free. And it excoriates the sheer corruption of the iron triangle of lawyers, bureaucrats, and politicians, who profit mightily from all this inefficiency, injustice, and abuse The Case Against Lawyers will make readers hopping mad. And it will make them realize that the only response can be to demand change. Now. ...

    December 12

    Time:Dino Killer: One Comet, not Many

    Dino Killer: One Comet, not Many

    Only 20 years ago, the notion that a giant comet or asteroid impact killed off the dinosaurs was still a radical theory, but the discovery of a huge buried crater at Chicxulub, on the coast of Mexico's Yucatan peninsula in the early 1990s proved that a strike from space was at least a major factor. The dust and debris thrown into the atmosphere from the impact would have cut off the sun, killing off  plants at the base of the food chain, and chilled the planet dramatically to boot. But geologists have questioned whether a single space rock could have done the job itself, or whether multiple impacts were involved.

    Nope--according, at least, to Ken MacLeod, a geologist at the University of Missouri-Columbia. Reasoning that sediments close to the impact site would be too churned up by the violence of the event to be useful, and that sediments too far away would contain too little debris to be definitive, he and several colleagues plumbed the seafloor about 2,800 miles away from the Yucatan. What they found was one and only one layer of impact-related material, dated to 65 million years ago--the precise age of the Chicxulub crater and of the dinosaurs' demise. His verdict: one shot from space was all it took.

    — M.L.

    Time:Bush's ratings are at an all-time low:

    34 Percent

    11 Dec 2006 05:10 pm

    Bush's ratings are at an all-time low:

    Bushapproval

    Permalink :: E-Mail This :: Trackback (0)

    Time:Water on Mars?

    Water on Mars?


    NASA/GETTY
    This light-toned deposit several hundred yards long illustrates where a gully flowed in the Centauri Montes Region

    Aside from the question "is there life on Mars," this is the big one. A whole series of orbiting cameras and surface rovers have been beaming back evidence that Mars had water flowing on its surface in the distant past, billions of years ago, but most of it seems to have vanished--from the surface, anyway. Planetary scientists have long held out hope that some of that water remains underground, but nobody's ever found the dribbling gun, as it were.

    But a little over an hour ago, NASA announced they'd found something pretty close. In before-and-after photos taken by the Mars Global Surveyor, which seems to have gone out of commission last month, you can see changes that look for all the world as if trickles of flowing water deposited new sediments in ancient Martian gullies, sometime between 1999 and 2005.

    That doesn't mean anyone is going to find lakes on the Red Planet--it's too cold, and the atmosphere is too thin, for liquid water to remain for more than a few minutes before freezing, then subliming off into water vapor. But it does suggest there's plenty under the ground--and where there's water, there could at least be microbial life (see above under "the big one").

    M.L.

    Time:Dobson on Cheney

    Dobson on Cheney

    11 Dec 2006 07:26 pm

    He attacks her family but says it isn't personal. Yes, it is, Mr Dobson. Then this:

    Traditional marriage is God's design for the family and is rooted in biblical truth. When that divine plan is implemented, children have the best opportunity to thrive. That's why public policy as it relates to families must be based not solely on the desires of adults but rather on the needs of children and what is best for society at large.

    There you have the essence of Christianism: divine law translated directly into civil law.

    December 11

    TIME:Ebola's Horrifying Toll

    TIME senior writer Michael D. Lemonick fills you in on what's hot in the world of science
     
    Thursday, Dec. 7, 2006

    Ebola's Horrifying Toll

    Thanks largely to Richard Preston's blockbuster bestseller The Hot Zone, and also to screaming headlines every time there's a new outbreak, Ebola virus is one of the most feared infectious agents in the world. The truth is that it has killed a few thousand humans, at most, in all of the recorded outbreaks in history--orders of magnitude fewer than malaria, diarrheal disease or tuberculosis kill in a single year.

    But according to a paper just published in Science, Ebola threatens to drive one of our closest evolutionary relatives out of existence entirely. According to a team of scientists from Gabon, Spain and Germany, an estimated 5,000 gorillas perished in two outbreaks in Congo in 2002 and 2003 alone--and that's a conservative estimate. Making the reasonable assumption that other outbreaks may have had comparable impact, and given the fact that the animals are hunted for meat and trophies, that their habitat is continually diminishing--and that total populations have been estimated at only about 100,000--there's good reason to fear that these majestic animals could be on a faster road to extinction than anyone thought.

    — M.L.

    From time:Has Stradivarius' Secret Been Solved?

    Has Stradivarius' Secret Been Solved?

    A rival publication which shall remain nameless published a piece yesterday describing the amazing new high-tech methods violin makers are using to try and reproduce--or even surpass--the extraordinary instruments made in Italy by the legendary Antonio Stradivari and  Giuseppe Guarneri, in the 1600s and 1700s. The story is full of references to graphite fibers and such--things you'd expect to find in a jet, not a fiddle.

    But the piece leaves out one crucial fact. The reason former racing-shell designers and the like are forced to invent new ways to make violins is that nobody to date has completely figured out why those 300-plus-year-old violins, made with simple hand tools from low-tech spruce and maple still sound better than pretty much any instruments made since. It's not for lack of trying: the secret of Stradivari and the others has been a matter of intensive investigation by luthiers, engineers and physicists for 100 years and more; the old violins have been taken apart and their pieces measured, calibrated and,vibrated at high frequency--with no agreement at all about what makes them tick, or, more accurately, sing.

    Today, however, a report in Nature is proposing at least a partial explanation. The extraordinary resonance of the old Italian violins, says a team of scientists led by Joseph Nagyvary, a biochemist at Texas A&M University, is...biochemistry. By sending tiny slivers from several Stradivari and Guarneri instruments through a sophisticated mass spectrometer, they've found evidence the wood was treated before it was carved into violins.

    What that treatment consisted of is left unspecified in the report--as is the fact that Nagyvary has been pursuing the Stradivarius mystery for more than 25 years, doing extensive research on the lumber business in Northern Italy centuries ago and on the finishes used by furniture makers in Cremona, where Stradivari lived and worked. In all that time, he's come up with some highly plausible theories--that the wood felled in Italian mountain forests was floated downriver and sat in Venetian lagoons for up to a year before being sold, absorbing the brackish waters (a chemical treatment, albeit inadvertent). And he's concluded that the varnishes Stradivari used may have been full of fruit sugars, giving the wood an especial stiffness that allows it to vibrate brilliantly.

    He's also been making violins according to his theories, and using sophisticated sound equipment to compare their sound with the real thing. And in a number of blind tests with real musicians and real audiences, Nagyvary's violins have equaled or even surpassed those of the Italian masters.

    And there's not a drop of graphite or epoxy or space-age plastic in them.

    From time:Smoking and the Knee

    Smoking and the Knee

    By Jeffrey Kluger | Friday, Dec. 8, 2006 |

    Smoking is the scourge that keeps on giving. To the long, long list of ways tobacco can do you harm, add yet one more: According to a study published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, pain and cartilage damage may be worse in men suffering from osteoarthritis who also smoke than in those who don't smoke.

    Investigators associated with the Mayo Clinic studied 159 male osteoarthritis patients, conducting magnetic resonance imaging scans of their knee cartilage and assessing their pain level, then following up on them 15 and 30 months later. In general, the smokers had a 2.3-fold greater chance of cartilage loss at the joint that connects the thigh and shin than the nonsmokers; and a 2.5-fold greater loss at the connection of knee cap and thigh. What's more, on a pain scale of 0 to 100, the smokers scored about 60 and the nonsmokers about 45, figures that remained essentially unchanged in the followups.

    What it means: It's not certain how tobacco smoke can harm your knees, but the investigators have some theories. Substances in smoke carried through the bloodstream may stunt critical cell growth in knee cartilage, increase damage by oxidant radicals, and boost carbon dioxide levels, which essentially suffocates knee tissue. The increased pain may come from all of these kinds of damage as well as from the possibility that smoking simply lowers overall well-being and with it, pain tolerance. The solution is not one that should surprise you: Quit.

    From the Archive:

    Dec. 9, 2002: The Age of Arthritis